March 30, 2009: The Day in 100 Seconds


Day in 100 Seconds for March 30, 2009

Tags: , ,

Your Ad Here

25 Responses to “March 30, 2009: The Day in 100 Seconds”

  1. gino07770 Says:

    This is not socialism. Socialism is about the redistribution of wealth. Not the control or bailing out of mega corporate industries. Printing money out of thin air is a stupid thing to do. It only results is the devaluation of the dollar, but the wall street friends of Obama, which I do not see how are they socialist, are glad to see tax payer money in their pockets.

  2. BuLLe7pRoFF Says:

    ☻/
    /▌
    /  just copy and paste bob has no patience

  3. rdelaware Says:

    Do not watch “The Obama Deception” on youtube, I hate that video. When they say President Obama is just a puppet for the New World Order bankers its not true! They lie in that film, they lie!!

  4. asd23sd3 Says:

    bahh, japanese cars are better, shit even if the japanese car is say 5 years old, its still as good as new. Chrysler just cant make a car that feels comfortable.

  5. drunkenboxer1985 Says:

    If you love the Republic then you hate Obama and his socialist agenda. (bush was terrible as well)

  6. message127 Says:

    I agree. If you’d like, try and shut up that crazy whitepride61.

  7. aswar314 Says:

    I was gonna spend some time writing a response to Mr. Ted, but looks like everyone else shut him up already.

    my favorite, “Tell me, in a sentence, what socialism is. ” touche.

  8. DONEwCA Says:

    Obama INDICTED by ‘Common Law Grand Jury’ in Georgia !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    see: worldnetdaily – On-line news March 31, 2009, and do your Google search strings. AOL picked it up.

    Why can’t this smooth talkin sitting President turn over his real birth certificate ?

  9. TedinLasVegas Says:

    Solutions? Let AIG fail. Let GM go into bankruptcy so they can get out from under their job-killing unions.

    There’s 2 solutions.

  10. TedinLasVegas Says:

    He, like Bush, is siezing control of the means of production.

    DUH, where have you been?

  11. TedinLasVegas Says:

    Ecology-destroying Hybrids, for example

  12. HaloedG Says:

    Which cars are you talking about? You really are a blowhard…you make claims with no proof or reference.

  13. HaloedG Says:

    So what has Obama done to demonstrate he is a socialist? I am more concerned with what capitalism has done in putting the country in its present state. Instead of the labels and name calling, let’s hear some solutions.

  14. MooseOfReason Says:

    OlivierdeAthos, You say we would be in “another Great Depression” right now without the FDIC, but where are we getting the money to pay for the guarantees? The government is $11 trillion in debt, and is spending trillions more.

    If the FDIC needed to get money to the depositors it insured, where would it get the money?

  15. MooseOfReason Says:

    And the ones that were Reagan’s, the Surface Freight Forwarder Deregulation Act and the Bus Regulatory Reform Act, were attempts at increasing freedom of entry into the marketplace.

  16. MooseOfReason Says:

    OlivierdeAthos,

    Airline Deregulation Act – 1978
    Staggers Rail Act – 1978
    Motor Carrier Act – 1980 (Carter)
    Federal Aviation Authorization Act – 1996, gave FAA administrator the ability to review regulations.
    Ocean Shipping ref act – 1998. In 2001, the Federal Maritime Commission said OSRA was on its way to achieving “a more market-driven, efficient liner shipping industry.”
    Telecom Act – 1996, increased telecom competition, VoIP (”voice over IP”).

  17. MooseOfReason Says:

    OlivierdeAthos, Only two of those laws were Reagan’s, which was Richardgwm’s complaint. Anyway…

    Commodity Futures Modernization – 2000, and it implemented recommendations by the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets.
    Responsible Lending Act – 2005, and what was deregulatory about this?
    Changes to the Clean Water and ESA – How is this related to the economy?
    [...] Labor Depts, [OSHA] and Mine Safety rules – What specific changes?
    Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Ref Act – 1976

  18. weRollin26s Says:

    sounds like it was a good day

  19. OlivierdeAthos Says:

    It was from “Charge of the Light Brigade” and he’s an ELITIST!

  20. OlivierdeAthos Says:

    The fractional reserve was actually lower than 10% for the GREs, which was part of the problem. (I think the SEC let them have 3%.)

    I never said GLBA was a totally Republican thing. It was signed by Clinton, who still defends it to this day. (Despite the fact that both it and CFMA were slipped into omnibus bills without debate. ) The guy was a good president, but sometimes has trouble admitting he made mistakes.

  21. OlivierdeAthos Says:

    FDIC didn’t guarantee ALL deposits. Up to $100K, per depositor per bank. (It’s up to $250K now, but only temporarily.) On the one hand, it creates a small moral hazard, but on the other it prevents bank runs in downturns, something which exacerbated the Great Depression. There’s no doubt in my mind that we’d be in another Great Depression right now if not for the FDIC.

  22. MooseOfReason Says:

    OlivierdeAthos, (Sorry, ran out of room in my other comment).

    We have a system of fractional reserve banking. In my other comment, someone deposited $5,000 in your bank. As a banker, if the rule is 10% reserves, you are allowed to lend out $25,000. However, you didn’t actually have that money to lend, so you created it “out of thin air.”

    Also, 75% of House Democrats and 84% of Senate Democrats voted for Gramm-Leach-Bliley, so it’s not 100% Republicans’ fault.

  23. MooseOfReason Says:

    OlivierdeAthos,

    The Glass-Steagall Act created the FDIC. If anything, the Glass-Steagall act allowed banks to be as reckless as they wanted to be, because the government backed the majority of the depositors’ money.

    Say someone deposits $5,000 in your bank and wants it back after two weeks. The government says they’ll guarantee 100% of the money if you lose it. You would have no incentive to be careful as to whom you lent the money.

  24. TedinLasVegas Says:

    Me, I guess I’d say I’m a bit of both; that’s why I worked AGAINST Bush in the 2000 primaries, I wanted a conservative Republican president – not the RINO / Compassionate “conservative” Bush.

    But, he was still lightyears better than Gore or Kerry. Those two are COMPLETE morons; just like D’ohBama.

  25. CarryANation Says:

    Who me? I was always against Bush! LOL I thought conservatives were supposed to believe in personal responsibility? Now they all sound like moral relativists.

    Oh wait my bad, of course you aren’t a conservative, you are a dittohead.

Leave a Reply